Answers to unsolved problems

(22 February 2012)

Using the theory of symmetries we can solve some questions that had been unanswered for a long time. And maybe in future we can even prove the theory itself.

• Arguments against the Supersymmetry (Susy) are the hierarchical structures like quarks, nuclei, atoms, molecules, and so on. It can only be inverted as a whole. We would need to invert the whole universe. The inverted particles could be solar systems, galaxies and universes.
  


• The string theory even with a infinity amount of dimensions would not be complete. Even if we add some dimensions for every hierarchical layer we cannot describe the links between the layers. The symmetries related to our 3d-space cannot be ignored. If in every time-step a whole new universe is generated this can be right in principle. But a symmetry like a moving body in space cannot be recognized in a simple way. That's why the principles of string theory are to "simple"
  


• The Higgs particle, if it exists, is not a carrier of the gravity. This can only be a approximation. Apparently in huge scales more than one gravity exists. It depends if we consider a solar system or a galaxy or the whole universe.
  


• In a experiment the violation of bells inequations could be less clear if the used sensors are for example separated in space. The effect should be similar to a disturbance.


• 6 July 2021: The Barnes-Hut-Simulation cannot describe detailed processes inside the spiral arms of galaxies. The rotations inside galaxies look like if the matter in the centre-bar is tight connected by gravity. The rest is pulled behind like a long chain. We don't know why galaxies behave in this way.


• 20 June 2021: Rotating galaxies and dark matter: Can we describe strange effects at rotating galaxies by "assuming" that the gravity is simply different from other forces because its always attracting structure and its week nature. The relativistic theory explains that an observer does not feel the gravitational field around it. Now we are imaging a cloud of gas creating a gravitational field using it's own mass. An observer inside this cloud would simply fall to the centre of the cloud if it is not rotating around the centre. But assuming it is a very small gas particle it would not detect any differences between any direction. A cloud of gas does not need to rotate to stay stable because particles keeps distance from each other. Could it be that the gravity and the rotation around the centre of mass neutralize each other? Could it be that an observer has no chance to detect if "its" universe is rotating. Now we consider the chaotic processes between particles. Because of the 3-body problem particles are thrown of their orbits. Because "outside" there are less possibilities for "collisions" than inside we get a "chaos"-gradient. Together with the gravitational pressure from outside the attracting gravity turns partly init a repellent force. Now, do we need to expand the theory of relativity with higher dimensions or can we explain everything using quantum mechanics? I think the solution will be a half symmetric and half chaotic fractal structure. Half of everything is symmetric. In galaxies this effect guides us to different stable states but they all make sense in logic way.



• (Image from Wikipedia.org)
  



• 30 december 2012: Could it be possible that light can be faster than the speed of light between galaxies, because there are less quantum states between. A outside observer would simply assume that galaxies contains more mass (gravitation lens effect). But less fermions or bosons does not mean that the atomic physical laws are changing. In principle the theory of relativity is converting a "infinite" speed to the limited speed of light for any observer. Similar effects for special limits are common in physics. For example the black-body radiation. Only because we are violating the symmetry of time (the time is only flowing in one direction) we can understand and calculate something. Because the atoms in the air are moving in a chaotic way, the air is so transparent. (Absorptions by quantum effects are ignored here.) But we cannot calculate EVERYTHING (paradox).
• 02 november 2024: If we assume that time flows in space like a wave than in respect of this perspective the speed of light will be simply infinite. By this perspective we can explain dark matter and also dark energy in a completely different way. The Herzsprung-Russel-Relationship and maybe also the Tully-Tisher-Relationship are not precise relations. The tolerances are huge, so we need something else to explain everything. We can use the chaotic motions of the stars and assume that there is a change in the physics if we use wavelength instead of masurings real angles in space. It's a transformation like the transformation between the classical physics and the quantum mechanics. We should accept that our brain cannot gasp the lowest bit of information and there is a lack in our precise logic reasoning itself.